DO THEY HOLD THE SAME VALUE & MEANING?
Out of all the fields in art and entertainment, it has always felt and been documented that the music industry is really the wild wild west. An industry where they are so many loopholes, unspoken laws & broken laws, always needing to play the game and adapt, no uniformity within artists, labels, companies, and fans, and with the growth of streaming over the last ten years, things have gotten even wilder. One of the things that did have rules and was standardised was our definition of the products and art being presented to us. We all had some understanding of what makes something an EP, album or mixtape and the clear differences between them but today it’s like a free-for-all and anything goes but that’s not how it should be so let’s break it down.
Let’s start with looking at the technical definitions. The term EP stands for Extended Play. This was started in the 1950s due to the technological restrictions because artists were using vinyl’s to record with. They figured that they could extend the play of a single by featuring it 3-6 times on a vinyl. This usually included the single, instrumental of the single, acapella of the single, a live version and sometimes a remix. This was a way to go around artists and record labels having to spend money to release LPs (Long Plays) or album. It was defined then that an EP is anything that is 15 – 20 minutes long and then around the late 1990’s – Early 2000’s it extended from anything between 15 – 30 minutes total, while an LP was defined as anything between 30 – 60 minutes total.
This definition is important to note because most people usually base what they consider an EP or an LP on the number of songs on the disc. You could say that the consensus amongst the music industry is an EP is anything that has 4-6 tracks but are around 3-7 tracks. Then with an LP it would be 8-15 tracks on the record. This was a widely practiced and you could say standardised method worldwide. We saw this from most global superstars following this format. Micheal Jackson’s Thriller was only 9 tracks long and his Invincible album being the longest with 16 tracks. As people always have them in comparison, figured I might as well, but Prince was the same with Purple Rain having 9 tracks and his highest track count being 16 on his Sign ‘O The Times album. That being the case Purple Rain run time is 43 minutes and 55 seconds and Thriller is 42 minutes and 16 seconds long. This was the norm in the past and recent past until streaming came along.
There was already a stigma that the music industry is a lawless place with no real rules and regulations put in place. When the streaming era came in it just made everything worse, but you can read on that in my Rage Against The Streams article. One of the points I raised in the mentioned article is because of streaming rules and payouts, artists and labels have taken the route of making shorter tracks to accumulate more streams. What was once an unspoken standard of tracks being an average of 3 minutes long suddenly took a turn, and the new standard became 1 and a half minutes – 2-minute-long tracks. This just didn’t affect single tracks but as well as projects and how we address and label these projects and body of works.
I’ll use one of the most recent releases that had received high public praise. I’m talking abut Willow Smith’s Black Petal Rock album. The album released 17 February 2026, about over a month ago. It contains 12 tracks, which in length of tracks would be album or LP standard. The problem comes in where these 12 tracks only accumulate to 26 minutes and 22 seconds of music. That is an EP, just a 12 track EP. The first thing we must look at is how are we redefine the terms and conditions of music, what previous titles used to mean and do we not care about keeping up these standards and history of music. The second thing we must look at is are we getting cheated and robbed as the consumers. Receiving 26 minute “albums” where a song is 2 minutes and 15 seconds on average. I saw this because the third thing I look at is the past and how Micheal Jackson and Prince could give us 9 tracks but feed us for 40 minutes plus of music. We’re not just being robbed as consumers, but the art and craft of music and recording is being cheated. People aren’t investing as much time, money, effort, and talent into creating body of works we can live with throughout our lives and create historic moments for us to always run back to.
I use this as just a general example of how music has been shifting and why conversations of, “What is an EP and LP in our modern era?,” have been based on. We’ve even seen some artist split their albums into separate EPs to get more streams than just release the album as a full LP. One genre that doesn’t seem to be having this problem as much, in terms of projects because the singles are a problem, is hip-hop.
I say this because with hip-hop we are still seeing artist give us 35 minutes plus of projects but with regards to the tracks we are the leaders of the 1 and a half minute tracks but we not getting into that for now. I want to look at the fact we are getting these lengthy projects in time which is beautiful but the ugly comes in with the number of tracks being put on to get to that length. I’ve noticed that we are regularly getting 16 – 20 tracks projects and that’s a lot of music. Too much music. It makes it hard to have a great album or classics because I believe a classic means that about 80% of the tracks on the album having to be great, whether lyrically, sonically or spirituality. It becomes harder when you have so many tracks on the album. I blame the mixtape for this type of thinking and system that has been implemented into the culture.
The origin of the mixtape comes from artists not having the financial backing or capital to get there tracks mixed and mastered, or tracks that they didn’t think were album worthy and never got mixed and mastered but still wanted them to be released. Hence the name Mixtape, a tape with a mix of unmixed tracks. We know hip-hop has always been making the most out of nothing and why we invented the mixtape. The mixtape became modernised when artist realised, they could use it to release tracks that they never got sample clearance from or tracks where they were rapping over instrumentals from other popular tracks from different artists. This trend took the mixtape popularity to a new level in the 2000s and it became a standard that you needed a fire mixtape to prove you are one of the best. Now because the mixtape was just meant to be a mix of songs to just put out for enjoyment, they were pretty length track wise usually having about 20 tracks minimum.
Now because the black community and especially in hip-hop never really had the funding and backing like that, it makes sense why a hip-hop artist would want to put out everything in one album with not knowing if the opportunity would come again and with the same level of investment. While I can understand the thinking, I don’t think it has helped achieve the top level of musicality potential we have. It’s why the classic album conversation is always tough because a lot of cults classic but not a lot of public classics and that’s honestly because the albums were mixtape length. When we think classics we think Nas – Illmatic, Jay-Z – The Blueprint, Kendrick Lamar – Good Kid M.A.A.D City, as a consensus. These are albums that are 10 – 14 track long albums. There is something we as a culture and music can learn from in making albums with intention and patience to get that perfect flow state of 10-14 tracks and that doesn’t feel like an overload of music. This has also caused a problem on how we define what’s an album and mixtape as well. We can’t even redefine it because everything is being mixed now so the length of project would be the define factor, but we can’t use that right now so now we stuck in the limbo of album vs mixtape.
In conclusion I know as artists and creatives we hate being boxed-in or defined, as we feel it restrictions but the opposite side of it is that it gives us intention and meaning. Knowing what something is and how it should be helps you adjust to purposefully carry out the plan and mission with intent. Whether it’s intent to execute according to the letter or to disrupt the system, we can understand what your goal is. With no definitions we are all just wandering about aimlessly trying to figure things out and with no answers or solve in place for us. Let us define the music again and what it means to us before it starts to mean nothing in the greater scheme of things.






































